Ingen lignende emner blev fundet.
0
Afvist
Unchecky does not remove the check mark for Yahoo sign-in. Why is that? It use to. I am on Hp desk top, Win7-64, chrome most recent.
Unchecky does not remove the check mark for Yahoo sign-in. Why is that? It use to. I am on Hp desk top, Win7-64, chrome most recent.
Svar
Unchecky
9 år siden
Hi Barbara,
A checkbox like this is not a goal of Unchecky.
Unchecky is designed to remove checkmarks from checkboxes that offer to install sponsored or unrelated programs, or to change the homepage or the search engine. The "Keep me signed in" checkbox doesn't fit into that category.
If you often need to sign into your email account without Yahoo remembering the credentials, you might want to use incognito mode.
A checkbox like this is not a goal of Unchecky.
Unchecky is designed to remove checkmarks from checkboxes that offer to install sponsored or unrelated programs, or to change the homepage or the search engine. The "Keep me signed in" checkbox doesn't fit into that category.
If you often need to sign into your email account without Yahoo remembering the credentials, you might want to use incognito mode.
0
Does not work on Aeseus Partition manager free
Does not clear checkbox for added program ToDo.
Download page: http://www.easeus.com/partition-manager/epm-free.html
Screenshot 1 : initial instalpage
Screenshot 2: next page with Todo backup still checked
Download page: http://www.easeus.com/partition-manager/epm-free.html
Screenshot 1 : initial instalpage
Screenshot 2: next page with Todo backup still checked
0
Færdig
Display more info after installation completion
After installation is done, there should be a big notification that a background service is now up and running (currently installer just says "done" and disappears).By Bojan at Softpedia.
0
False positive on install of utility "Swap 'Em" - unchecked option to open help file after installation
Not sure if opening *any* file automatically after install is a prima facie reason for unchecking... if not, it was perfectly benign. Here's the website of the publisher: Swap 'Em
I don't want to seem ungrateful for the app, though: this was the first questionable call Unchecky has ever made for me in the year I've had it, and that's a great batting average. Thanks, and keep it up!
I don't want to seem ungrateful for the app, though: this was the first questionable call Unchecky has ever made for me in the year I've had it, and that's a great batting average. Thanks, and keep it up!
0
Afvist
Check Sweethome 3D.
Hi, SweetHome3D propose to install some toolbars, even with unchecky active. http://www.sweethome3d.com/
0
Færdig
Яндекс элементы savefrom.net
Это оставить, чтобы установились дополнения для браузера
Эти снять яндекс элементы
Эти снять яндекс элементы
Svar
Unchecky
10 år siden
Here is the song, Who Knows by Dima Kim:
http://rammichael.com/misc/files/Dima%20Kim%20-%20...
Dima Kim is a good friend of mine, and I'd like to thank him for letting me to use his song in the demonstration video of Unchecky, and for allowing to publish it freely.
http://rammichael.com/misc/files/Dima%20Kim%20-%20...
Dima Kim is a good friend of mine, and I'd like to thank him for letting me to use his song in the demonstration video of Unchecky, and for allowing to publish it freely.
Svar
Unchecky
9 år siden
Currently, Unchecky is not able to handle checkboxes which appear on websites.
For more info, please see:
http://unchecky.userecho.com/topic/320753-flashplayer-adobe-checkmark-to-install-macafee-on-the-download-page-is-not-removed/
Closing as duplicate.
For more info, please see:
http://unchecky.userecho.com/topic/320753-flashplayer-adobe-checkmark-to-install-macafee-on-the-download-page-is-not-removed/
Closing as duplicate.
Svar
RaMMicHaeL
10 år siden
I can't think why duplicates in the hosts file could cause problems.
Windows will probably just use one of the two entries, and will block the address regardless of which line it chooses.
As a side note, thanks for the link. It has valuable information about the fact that using the "0.0.0.0" address is a more effective solution than using "127.0.0.1"
Windows will probably just use one of the two entries, and will block the address regardless of which line it chooses.
As a side note, thanks for the link. It has valuable information about the fact that using the "0.0.0.0" address is a more effective solution than using "127.0.0.1"
Kundesupport af UserEcho
